Posted by:

Sportsmeels
SportsmeelsJanuary 3, 2008
Add Sportsmeels as a friend.
Send Sportsmeels a message.

Related Content

LaxMike
Which network has the ...Posted by LaxMike
pkang55
Which college football...Posted by pkang55
LaxMike
Who will win the NL We...Posted by LaxMike
Laxman4304
What is your favorite ...Posted by Laxman4304
Dr. Mike Pick
Who will be the better...Posted by Dr. Mike Pick
Dr. Mike Pick
Will Tom Brady miss an...Posted by Dr. Mike Pick

Poll

view

Clemens in the HOF pre-PEDs?

Sportsmeels
Poll submitted by Sportsmeels, 8 months ago

Let’s assume for a minute that all the performance-enhancing-drug rumors are true, and that the commencement began in the “twilight of his career”, aka 1997. Based on his statistics up until that point, would he be a HOF-er even if he’d had a couple crappy years after and then retired?

Total votes: 16
0 points
 3 comments | Email This |
78 Views | Sports: Baseball | Tags: Hall of Fame, performance-enhancing drugs, RogerClemens | Report Abuse
Comments (login or register to post comments)

Rocket would have no rings this is all hypothetical but I don’t think the Rocket would have any rings had he not “allegedly” juiced. His Toronto resurrection wouldn’t have happened thus the Yankees career wouldn’t have followed. On the contrary, Bonds never had a down year before Balco. Balco just made him better than he already was, it didn’t resurrect his career.

by BobbyBluechip on January 2, 2008 at 3:57 pm

... You can’t argue that those stats were SOLID. But I’m not positive he would be a definite shoe-in.

by mikebahlsen on January 2, 2008 at 6:35 pm

Definitely Not a First Ballot HOF Anyone linked to using PEDs or HGH will never be a first ballot HOF nor do they deserve to be.

Rcger would still get in the HOF however as will Mark McGwire some day (I think?)

by NYSportsguy on January 3, 2008 at 1:50 pm